(1+1)-Cholesky-CMA-ES 2006 (OPOC2006)¶
- class pypop7.optimizers.es.opoc2006.OPOC2006(problem, options)¶
(1+1)-Cholesky-CMA-ES 2006 (OPOC2006).
- Parameters:
problem (dict) –
- problem arguments with the following common settings (keys):
’fitness_function’ - objective function to be minimized (func),
’ndim_problem’ - number of dimensionality (int),
’upper_boundary’ - upper boundary of search range (array_like),
’lower_boundary’ - lower boundary of search range (array_like).
options (dict) –
- optimizer options with the following common settings (keys):
’max_function_evaluations’ - maximum of function evaluations (int, default: np.Inf),
’max_runtime’ - maximal runtime to be allowed (float, default: np.Inf),
’seed_rng’ - seed for random number generation needed to be explicitly set (int);
- and with the following particular settings (keys):
’sigma’ - initial global step-size, aka mutation strength (float),
’mean’ - initial (starting) point, aka mean of Gaussian search distribution (array_like),
if not given, it will draw a random sample from the uniform distribution whose search range is bounded by problem[‘lower_boundary’] and problem[‘upper_boundary’].
Examples
Use the optimizer to minimize the well-known test function Rosenbrock:
1>>> import numpy 2>>> from pypop7.benchmarks.base_functions import rosenbrock # function to be minimized 3>>> from pypop7.optimizers.es.opoc2006 import OPOC2006 4>>> problem = {'fitness_function': rosenbrock, # define problem arguments 5... 'ndim_problem': 2, 6... 'lower_boundary': -5*numpy.ones((2,)), 7... 'upper_boundary': 5*numpy.ones((2,))} 8>>> options = {'max_function_evaluations': 5000, # set optimizer options 9... 'seed_rng': 2022, 10... 'mean': 3*numpy.ones((2,)), 11... 'sigma': 0.1} # the global step-size may need to be tuned for better performance 12>>> opoc2006 = OPOC2006(problem, options) # initialize the optimizer class 13>>> results = opoc2006.optimize() # run the optimization process 14>>> # return the number of function evaluations and best-so-far fitness 15>>> print(f"OPOC2006: {results['n_function_evaluations']}, {results['best_so_far_y']}") 16OPOC2006: 5000, 2.2322932872757695e-17
For its correctness checking of coding, refer to this code-based repeatability report for more details.
References
Igel, C., Suttorp, T. and Hansen, N., 2006, July. A computational efficient covariance matrix update and a (1+1)-CMA for evolution strategies. In Proceedings of Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation (pp. 453-460). ACM. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/1143997.1144082